Skip to content
0:00 / 0:00

#yoshuabengio#yannlecun#maxtegmark

Munk Debate on Artificial Intelligence | Bengio & Tegmark vs. Mitchell & LeCun

Policy-Relevant Science & Technology

3.7K subscribers • 1 video on Hallway

YouTube
  • Recommended by 2 people: 2 on Hacker News.
  • An opinion. It argues one side of a question engineers disagree on.

Intermediate. Assumes working knowledge.

117K views3 years ago2 recommendations

AI and machine learningAI safety and impactNeural networks and deep learning

Yoshua Bengio, Max Tegmark, Melanie Mitchell, and Yann LeCun debate whether artificial intelligence research and development poses an existential threat to humanity.

PROPOSITION "AI research and development poses an existential threat." SUMMARY With the debut of ChatGPT, the AI once promised in some distant future seems to have suddenly arrived with the potential to reshape our working lives, culture, politics and society. For proponents of AI, we are entering a period of unprecedented technological change that will boost productivity, unleash human creativity and empower billions in ways we have only begun to fathom. Others think we should be very concerned about the rapid and unregulated development of machine intelligence. For their detractors, AI applications like ChatGPT herald a brave new world of deep fakes and mass propaganda that could dwarf anything our democracies have experienced to date. Immense economic and political power may also concentrate around the corporations who control these technologies and their treasure troves of data. Finally, there is an existential concern that we could, in some not-so-distant future, lose control of powerful AIs who, in turn, pursue goals that are antithetical to humanity’s interests and our survival as a species. DEBATERS • Yoshua Bengio: Full Professor at Université de Montréal, and the Founder and Scientific Director of Mila – Quebec AI Institute (yoshuabengio.org) • Max Tegmark: Professor doing AI and physics research at MIT as part of the Institute for Artificial Intelligence & Fundamental Interactions and the Center for Brains, Minds and Machines (physics.mit.edu/faculty/max-tegmark/) • Melanie Mitchell: Professor at the Santa Fe Institute (melaniemitchell.me) • Yann LeCun: VP & Chief AI Scientist at Meta and Silver Professor at NYU affiliated with the Courant Institute of Mathematical Sciences & the Center for Data Science (yann.lecun.com) RESULTS munkdebates.com/debates/artificial-intelligence #AI #ML #Risk

Why it's here

2 people recommend this

What people say. Recommended as a high-profile debate showcasing opposing viewpoints on AI existential risk from leading researchers.

caliaihereon Hacker News • Recommends

On “The Darwinian argument for worrying about AI”

…nown unknown" consequences just like there have been consequences with the rest of the so called "goodwill" advancements. It's suicidal to think otherwise. Pretending there wont be is just their historically proven strategy to play down your fears. It's just part of the run of the mill PR management tactic. Nothing new to see here. Tis a good one: link to this video…

rramadasson Hacker News • Recommends

On “Sam Altman Exposes the Charade of AI Accountability”

…veillance; emerging risks from technological unemployment, digital manipulation, and weaponization; and speculative risks from losing control of future artificial general intelligence (AGI) agents. Also watch Munk debate: AI research and development poses an existential threat featuring Yoshua Bengio, Max Tegmark, Melanie Mitchell and Yann LeCun - link to this video…

civilizedon Hacker News • Mentions

On “The Darwinian argument for worrying about AI”

I just opened it up and found a fun bit during Melanie Mitchell's opener: link to this video Paraphrasing: > Yoshua Bengio has written about a scenario where an AI is asked to solve climate change, and it designs a virus that decimates humans. Presto. No more humans, no more climate change. > This is an example of the fallacy of dumb superintelligence. It's a fallacy to think that a machine could be smarter than humans in all respects and still lack all common-sense understanding of humans, such as understanding why we made the request and that we prefer not to be wiped out... We would never give unchecked autonomy and resources to an AI that lacked these basic aspects of intelligence - it just does no…

rramadasson Hacker News • Mentions

On “AI and the End of Programming”

Very well said! The big problem is going to be some "not so intelligent" Human making decisions based on AI/ML output without verification or even worse having AI itself make the decision. Here is a Munk debate "AI research and development poses an existential threat" - Yoshua Bengio & Max Tegmark vs. Melanie Mitchell & Yann Lecun - link to this video