Skip to content
0:00 / 0:00

#reasonml#ocaml#react

Jordan Walke - React to the Future

ReasonConf

1.8K subscribers • 1 video on Hallway

YouTube
  • Recommended by 5 people: 4 on Hacker News and 1 on Lobsters.
  • Presented by Jordan Walke, creator of React
  • May be out of date. Uploaded 6 years ago, in an area where tools change fast.
  • An opinion. It argues one side of a question engineers disagree on.

Intermediate. Assumes working knowledge.

47K views6 years ago5 recommendations

Web developmentProgramming languagesReactVue, Svelte, Angular and othersFunctional programming

Jordan Walke discusses the functional programming ideas behind ReasonML and how it serves as a logical extension of React's paradigm.

ReasonConf US 2019, Chicago, 10/08/2019 Twitter: twitter.com/reasonconf Website: reason-conf.com

Why it's here

5 people recommend this

What people say. Engineers recommend this talk to understand the functional programming philosophy behind React and the design goals of ReasonML.

brypheon Hacker News • Recommends

On “Onivim 2: Lightweight, Modal Code Editor”

I'd highly recommend Jordan Walke's (creator of React) talk on the ideas behind ReasonML: React to the Future 1. I think it's so cool that you can take the ideas of ReactJS - functional programming applied to UI - but then have a language (ReasonML 2) that is essentially purpose built for it, with OCaml 3 powering it under the hood - a functional programming language that's been significantly invested in, both in academia and industry. And to be able to take React-the-Idea, compile it cross-platform, to native-code... and ship. - 1 Jordan Walke - React to the Future: link to this video - 2 link - 3 link

huy-nguyenon Hacker News • Recommends

On “Ask HN: Best Talks of 2019?”

“Why isn’t functional programming the norm?” by Richard Feldman. Spoiler: not on the basis of merits. link “React to the future” by Jordan Walke. Why ReasonML is a logical extension of ReactJS’ programming paradigm. link to this video “Typing the untyped: soundness in gradual type systems” by Ben Weissmann. The trade offs that various gradual type systems make based on their language constraints. link “Let’s program like it’s 1999” by Lee Byron. How the mutual feedback loop of abstraction, syntax and mental model drives the evolution of web technologies. link

thegreatpeteron Hacker News • Recommends

On “Reason React 0.8”

The long awaited 0.8.0 release from Reason React is out of beta! This includes a lot of the niceties of writing React but in a very fast, type safe language. If this is your first time hearing about Reason, watch a video from its creator (Jordan Walke, creator of React) to learn more: link to this video Fun facts about Reason: - exports TypeScript! If you have a TS project and looking for some extra speed & stability, you don't have to sacrifice type safety interop - It powers all of Messenger.com. The team put out a case study where they went from ~10 bugs a week to less than 10 a quarter by switching to Reason - It uses the npm / yarn ecosystem so you can use your favorite / current packages without…

deltasevennineon Hacker News • Recommends

On “Why Racket? Why Lisp? (2014)”

He's a Fullstack JS developer which is even dumber because he uses React which is basically the defacto JS front end framework. React is trending heavily away from OOP, it's creators heavily buy into FP, and most of the patterns in react are inspired heavily by FP. Functional components are now the way to go. ReasonML (a pure FP language) is react as intended and is the northstar of React. To learn more here is a video from Jordan Walke creator of React (and ReasonML): link to this video I recommend parent commenter to learn more about the very tools he himself works with before disparaging FP and himself.

citizen428on Lobsters • Recommends

React to the Future

amw-zeroon Hacker News • Mentions

On “Programming a space invader in OCaml and OpenGL: lessons learned”

Jordan Walke, the creator of Reason (also the creator of React) said that syntax is unfortunately very important, because psychologically people want something familiar. I think syntax is totally superficial, but I’m also a human who interacts with other humans. And they do not think it’s superficial. The talk where he says this: link to this video