Skip to content
0:00 / 0:00

#charlesbabbage#differenceengine#adalovelace

Charles Babbage and Difference Enginge No. 2 | Doron Swade | Talks at Google

Talks at Google

2.4M subscribers • 13 videos on Hallway

YouTube
  • Recommended by 1 person: 1 on Hacker News.
  • Presented by Doron Swade, technology historian

Beginner. No background in the topic needed.

9.9K views18 years ago1 recommendation

History and cultureComputer scienceHistory of computingPeople who shaped computing

Doron Swade shares the history of Charles Babbage's quest to build the Difference Engine and Ada Lovelace's early computing insights.

In 1821, Charles Babbage was reviewing a set of mathematical tables with a colleague in preparation for a scientific presentation when, after finding a wealth of errors, he exclaimed in frustration, "I wish to God these calculations had been executed by steam!" With this outburst, Babbage began to envision an end to human errors in the numerical tables upon which finance, trade, science, and navigation relied. The Difference Engine is the fascinating story of his heroic quest, against all odds, to build the first computing machine more than one hundred years before the modern computer we use today was invented. Doron Swade, an engineer, technology historian, and leading authority on Charles Babbage, was previously the assistant director and head of collections at London's Science Museum and is now Director of the Babbage project. He is also the mastermind of a seventeen-year project to construct a Babbage calculating engine from original nineteenth century designs. This talk took place on May 8, 2008 at Google's Mountain View, CA headquarters as part of the Authors@Google program.

Why it's here

1 person recommends this

What people say. Recommended for its historical insights, particularly the discussion around Ada Lovelace's contributions to early computing.

jsqron Hacker News • Recommends

On “Happy birthday, Ada Lovelace — the first computer programmer”

Some of the claims made about Ada are certainly mistaken, but there are also good arguments for genuine, important contributions. See, for example, Babbage historian Doron Swade's discussion of her insight into potential applications of the Analytical Engine beyond numeric calculation (beginning at 36:30): link to this video By the way, a very good biography of Grace Hopper was published a few years ago: link

no1neon Hacker News • Mentions

On “Giants of IT. The giants on whose shoulders we stand. One each day”

I remembered reading an article regarding this over-hype - link Also this video - link to this video jumping to minute 36 where Ada is discussed by the speaker.

no1neon Hacker News • Mentions

On “Giants of IT. The giants on whose shoulders we stand. One each day”

Babbage created the machine and he would not know how to run it? He would not know how to program it? The absurdity of this is astounding. Babbage was the first programmer. There is a google talk about Babbage's machines and the speaker also talked about Ada at the 36 min mark -- link to this video

no1neon Hacker News • Mentions

On “Cracking coder – The legacy of Ada Lovelace”

…e public that they were authored by her. It is no exaggeration to say that she was a manic depressive with the most amazing delusions about her own talents, and a rather shallow understanding of both Charles Babbage and the Analytical Engine There is a google talk about Babbage's machines and the speaker also talked about Ada at the 36 min mark -- link to this video Further links for your blithe mind to perus…

beefmanon Hacker News • Mentions

On “How We Lost the Women in Computing (2018)”

Women were never in computing in the sense imagined by the author. The manual "computers" and early patch-cord "programmers" he mentions carried out instructions by wrote. Instructions created by men. Women left the field when these jobs became obsolete. Hopper is a notable exception. Lovelace, not so much.1 Women did a lot of QA through the aughties. Again, this work was automated. 1 link to this video

908B64B197on Hacker News • Mentions

Lovelace's insight was understanding that it was possible to represent symbols using numbers (letters, notes of music) and that therefore a machine that could perform calculation could also perform computation 0. That's something Babbage didn't anticipate (or at least, didn't express it publicly). Lovelace did. Now this article, while true, will sadly get flagged any minute now. EDIT: Wow, I had not seen the rest of the site and the alarming white suppremacist content. 0 link to this video