Skip to content
0:00 / 0:00

#quantumcomputing#computationalcomplexity#scottaaronson

Quantum Computing and the Limits of the Efficiently Computable - 2011 Buhl Lecture

Carnegie Mellon University

170K subscribers • 3 videos on Hallway

YouTube
  • Recommended by 1 person: 1 in engineering communities.
  • Presented by Scott Aaronson, associate professor of electrical engineering and computer science at MIT

Intermediate. Assumes working knowledge.

59K views15 years ago1 recommendation

Computer scienceQuantum computingComputation and complexity

Scott Aaronson discusses the capabilities and limitations of quantum computing and what they mean for computational complexity theory.

Scott Aaronson, an expert in the realm of computational complexity theory and the founder of ComplexityZoo.com online encyclopedia of computational complexity theory delivered Carnegie Mellon University's 2011 Buhl Lecture. In his lecture titled "Quantum Computing and the Limits of the Efficiently Computable," Aaronson discusses what quantum computers are, whether they can be built on a large scale, and what's known today about their capabilities and limitations. He goes beyond quantum computers to touch on speculative models of computation, including closed time-like curves and nonlinearities in the Schrodinger equation — an equation that describes how the quantum state of a physical system changes in time. An associate professor of electrical engineering and computer science at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Aaronson's work on the subject of quantum computing has included limitations of quantum algorithms in the black-box model, the learnability of quantum states, and quantum versus classical proofs and advice. He writes a popular blog (www.scottaaronson.com/blog). For more on the Buhl Lectures, visit: cmu.edu/physics/seminars-and-events/buhl-lectures/

Why it's here

1 person recommends this

What people say. Recommended as an accessible yet deep introduction to quantum computing and complexity theory.

u/ndangerin r/compsci • Recommends

Quantum Computing and the Limits of the Efficiently Computable (Scott Aaaronson's 2011 Buhl Lecture @ CMU) Youtube

u/AlternativeHistorianin r/compsci • Mentions

On “What theoretical CS videos should everybody watch?”

I love this one. Powerful stuff.

u/Faggot_Fredriksonin r/compsci • Mentions

On “Are the results of theoretical computer science truly fundamental to the universe?”

This dude goes trough a lengthy list of examples that support the idea that P≠NP is not only a pure math thing, but also a fundamental principle of physics: link to this video Amazing talk!

u/nabla9in r/compsci • Mentions

On “Straw poll: Who really believes that P might just equal NP after all?”

Quantum Computing and the Limits of the Efficiently Computable - 2011 Buhl Lecture link to this video At the end of this lecture, Scott Aaronson makes the interesting postulate that potentially connects NP to physics. Direct link to that point in lecture: link to this video “The No-SuperSearch Postulate” : There is no physical means to solve NP-complete problems in polynomial time. (Includes P!=NP as a special case, but is stronger) This is no longer a purely mathematical conjecture, but also a claim about the laws of physics. If true, would “explain” why adiabatic systems have small spectral gaps, the Schrödinger equation is linear, closed timelike curves don't exist, ... (go back in lecture to see exam…

u/RonAnonWeasleyin r/compsci • Mentions

On “Intro to Quantum Computing (IBM)”

This is a really good lecture on the subject: link to this video

u/Fuco1337in r/compsci • Mentions

On “Can quantum computers solve P=NP?”

Somehow related: link to this video His talk: Quantum Computing and the Limits of the Efficiently Computable - 2011 Buhl Lecture. I love that man.

u/Fuco1337in r/compsci • Mentions

On “A question regarding DFAs, CFGs and Turing machines:”

Well OK, I see now. It's just that people generally don't concern themselves with benigh stuff like "if a model can be build in real life" when discussing complexity theory and such topics :D But of course you're (probably - since we're not yet so sure about those blackhole computers kind of things) right. Somewhat related S.A. link to this video