Skip to content
0:00 / 0:00

#richardstallman#gnu#linux

Free software, free society: Richard Stallman at TEDxGeneva 2014

TEDx Talks

44M subscribers • 10 videos on Hallway

YouTube
  • Recommended by 3 people: 2 on Hacker News and 1 on Lobsters.
  • A classic. People kept recommending it from 2015 to 2023.
  • Presented by Richard Stallman, founder of the Free Software movement
  • An opinion. It argues one side of a question engineers disagree on.

Beginner. No background in the topic needed.

487K views12 years ago3 recommendations

History and cultureSystems programmingOpen sourceHistory of computingOperating systems

Richard Stallman explains the philosophy of the free software movement and how nonfree programs control their users.

It is the first TEDx talk of the founder of Free Software movement. Stallman, RMS for short, has changed the world with his vision of freedom for the digital age. He launched the GNU operating system, used with Linux as a component, and inspired the development of Creative Commons licences and Wikipedia project. In this talk, Stallman describes how nonfree programs give companies control of their users and what users can do in order to recover control over their computing. Licence: Creative Commons BY-SA-ND 3.0 CREDITS : Drawings under CC-BY-ND 3.0 created by Christian Nogareda (Kwis, Http://kwis.tumblr.com) & Valentin Pasquier (utopiqdream.deviantart.com) based on ideas of Richard Stallman, by himself & Ynternet.org foundation. In the spirit of ideas worth spreading, TEDx is a program of local, self-organized events that bring people together to share a TED-like experience. At a TEDx event, TEDTalks video and live speakers combine to spark deep discussion and connection in a small group. These local, self-organized events are branded TEDx, where x = independently organized TED event. The TED Conference provides general guidance for the TEDx program, but individual TEDx events are self-organized.* (*Subject to certain rules and regulations)

Why it's here

3 people recommend this

What people say. Recommended as a clear introduction to the ethical and political distinction between free software and open source.

WilhelmVonWeineron Lobsters • Recommends

Free software, free society

arfaron Hacker News • Recommends

On “VMWare Taken to Court Over GPL Violation”

You and all of the "Free Software" world have different definitions on free. I'd recommend this1 talk by Richard Stallman, it's pretty basic, but it gets the idea across well. 1 link to this video

thesuperbigfrogon Hacker News • Recommends

On “Some Thoughts on Windows 10”

Sounds very frustrating. I don't use Windows on any of the computers I own. I prefer to have more control over my computer so I use Linux. I still have to use Windows at work, but I don't admin those machines so I don't have a lot of control / choice in the matter. Food for thought about who controls your computer: link to this video

thesuperbigfrogon Hacker News • Recommends

On “Linux Is Free If You Don't Value Your Time”

Windows is closed source, full of ads and telemetry, and increasingly user hostile. MacOS is a mostly closed source, expensive, user-condescending walled garden. Linux, BSDs, and free / open source operating systems give the user freedom and control over their computing experience: link to this video

thesuperbigfrogon Hacker News • Recommends

On “We need more of Richard Stallman, not less”

The four freedoms that free software guarantee are essential for people to be in control of their own computing. Are you in control of your computer, or does your computer control you? link to this video People get angry and frustrated when a big tech company makes a decision that is user-hostile, but benefits the tech company's profits. This is to be expected because in almost all cases, the big tech company has no obligation other than to maximize profits. The four freedoms help to put a check on the power of big tech companies by providing alternatives that keep power in the hands of the user. That does not mean that free software and big tech companies cannot coexist or even thrive together. Red Ha…

rianon Hacker News • Mentions

On “The JavaScript Trap”

"Open Source" terminology emphasizes its technical superiority as a development method. "Free Software" terminology emphasizes its ethical necessity to maintain a free society. One is technical, one is political/ideological. Open source advocates don't care about politics, Free software advocates think technical superiority is unimportant in a non-free society. Stallman's own words on this distinction in this video: link to this video

thesuperbigfrogon Hacker News • Mentions

On “Macs with T2, M1 chips cannot be restored to factory state without Apple”

Apple may sell you a computer, but ultimately you do not control it. Who really controls your computer: link to this video

augustkon Hacker News • Mentions

On “Can't uninstall Adobe apps without an account (2018)”

As Richard Stallman puts it "either the user controls the program or the program controls the user." link to this video

thesuperbigfrogon Hacker News • Mentions

On “Ask HN: Could Microsoft restrict access to file backups via Microsoft Account?”

>> if Microsoft were to ban my account 1, could they then stop me from opening my backup files on a new machine, even if I made a new account? If your documents are tagged with the banned account info, it certainly seems possible. It seems like a really dirty thing to do, but there are lots of HN users who are against the Microsoft account requirement for Windows 11: link Possible issues like these are one reason why free and open source software exist: link to this video

thesuperbigfrogon Hacker News • Mentions

On “Netflix's new player breaks the ability to modify the seeking of a playing video”

"Who controls your computer? Is it you?" "Either the user controls the software, or the software controls the users": link to this video

thesuperbigfrogon Hacker News • Mentions

On “Windows 11 Officially Shuts Down Firefox’s Default Browser Workaround”

Microsoft is showing that they are really the ones who are in control. "Either the user controls the software, or the software controls the users": link to this video

thesuperbigfrogon Hacker News • Mentions

On “Outlook just asked me if I want to upgrade to bigger ads”

Microsoft is showing that they are really the ones who are in control. "Either the user controls the software, or the software controls the users": link to this video

thesuperbigfrogon Hacker News • Mentions

On “Tell HN: Siri provides Apple Music link when sharing current song on Spotify”

>> Digital assistants do not exist to serve you or your interests. You should assume that your every interaction with one will be exploited in some way for someone else's benefit, or leaked and/or sold to some third party without your knowledge, or both. Correct. Siri is Apple's tool, not yours despite appearences: link to this video

thesuperbigfrogon Hacker News • Mentions

On “Mercedes locks faster acceleration behind a $1,200 annual paywall”

It's not fully "your vehicle" if they control the software: link to this video You can pay a recurring subscription fee to access features that they own.

thesuperbigfrogon Hacker News • Mentions

On “Intel Officially Introduces Pay-as-You-Go Chip Licensing”

…n (SDSi) technology will also allow Intel to sell fewer CPU models and then enable its clients or partners to activate certain features if needed (to use them on-prem or offer them as a service)." Apparently Intel believes that subscription-driven microprocessors will be a great revenue stream. It's not your processor if they control the firmware: link to this video You can pay a subscription fee to access features that they own. I will not be buying any new Intel processors.…

valleyeron Hacker News • Mentions

On “Richard Stallman's Ted talk in Steve Jobs' style/voice (elevenlabs.io/ChatGPT)”

This is remarkably good, both the (I assume) human-generated slides and text and the computer-generated voice. Here's the original, I think: link to this video