Skip to content
0:00 / 0:00

#quantummechanics#superposition#polarizedlight

Some light quantum mechanics (with minutephysics)

3Blue1Brown

8.7M subscribers • 42 videos on Hallway

YouTube
  • Recommended by 2 people: 2 on Hacker News.
  • Presented by Grant Sanderson, creator of 3Blue1Brown

Intermediate. Assumes working knowledge.

2.2M views9 years ago2 recommendations

Computer scienceQuantum computingMath for programmers

Grant Sanderson explains the mathematics of superposition and quantum states using the polarization of light.

The math of superposition and quantum states. Minutephysics channel: youtube.com/user/minutephysics Help fund future projects: patreon.com/3blue1brown This video was sponsored by Brilliant: brilliant.org/3b1b An equally valuable form of support is to simply share some of the videos. Special thanks to these supporters: 3b1b.co/light-quantum-thanks Huge thanks to my friend Evan Miyazono, both for encouraging me to do this project, and for helping me understand many things along the way. This is a simple primer for how the math of quantum mechanics, specifically in the context of polarized light, relates to the math of classical waves, specifically classical electromagnetic waves. I will say, if you *do* want to go off and learn the math of quantum mechanics, you just can never have too much linear algebra, so check out the series I did at youtube.com/playlist?list=PLZHQObOWTQDPD3MizzM2xVFitgF8hE_ab Mistakes: As several astute commenters have pointed out, the force arrow is pointing the wrong way at . Thanks for the catch! *Note on conventions: Throughout this video, I use a single-headed right arrow to represent the horizontal direction. The standard in quantum mechanics is actually to use double-headed arrows for describing polarization states, while single-headed arrows are typically reserved for the context of spin. What's the difference? Well, using a double-headed arrow to represent the horizontal direction emphasizes that in a quantum mechanical context, there's no distinction between left and right. They each have the same measurable state: horizontal (e.g. they pass through horizontally oriented filters). Once you're in QM, these kets are typically vectors in a more abstract space where vectors are not necessarily spatial directions but instead represent any kind of state. Because of how I chose to motivate things with classical waves, where it makes sense for this arrow to represent a unit vector in the right direction, rather than the more abstract idea of a horizontal state vector, I chose to stick with the single-headed notation throughout, though this runs slightly against convention. Music by Vincent Rubinetti: vincerubinetti.bandcamp.com/album/the-music-of-3blue1brown Thanks to these viewers for their contributions to translations Hebrew: Omer Tuchfeld ------------------ 3blue1brown is a channel about animating math, in all senses of the word animate. And you know the drill with YouTube, if you want to stay posted on new videos, subscribe, and click the bell to receive notifications (if you're into that). If you are new to this channel and want to see more, a good place to start is this playlist: 3b1b.co/recommended Various social media stuffs: Website: 3blue1brown.com Twitter: twitter.com/3Blue1Brown Patreon: patreon.com/3blue1brown Facebook: facebook.com/3blue1brown Reddit: reddit.com/r/3Blue

Why it's here

2 people recommend this

What people say. Recommended as an accessible introduction to quantum states and the math behind quantum mechanics.

vulcan01on Hacker News • Recommends

On “Ask HN: What scientific phenomenon do you wish someone would explain better?”

I found these two videos very helpful in understanding the quantum nature of light after being stuck in the same spot: link link to this video (Watch those in order, because they're a collaboration between two YouTubers)

monocasaon Hacker News • Recommends

On “Ask HN: What scientific phenomenon do you wish someone would explain better?”

Minute Physics and 3brown1blue did a two part collab that simplifies some of it down to a counting problem that'd be suitable for grade school. link link to this video

guerrillaon Hacker News • Mentions

On “Why Quantum Mechanics?”

> I have a lot of trouble imagining any experiment which could completely rule out every other influencing factor It's called Bell's theorem and it can even be tested at home4. There are no local hidden variables in quantum mechanics.123 1. link 2. link 3. link 4a. link 4b. link to this video

gus_massaon Hacker News • Mentions

On “Chaos theory eliminates quantum uncertainty”

What you are describing is a "hidden variable" theory. They are disproved by the experiments of the Bell's inequality. It's more weird, much more weird. Let's continue with your experiment about the pair of red or green socks. If you and your friend measure if they are red-or-green, both will get the same results. This can be explained with a classical theory. Nobody disagree with that. The weird part is that you can measure if they are 50%red and 50%green! Can I call it yellow? This makes no sense with classical socks and colors, but it makes sense for quantum particles and other properties. But there are two ways to combine 50%red and 50%green, the technical notation is (R+G)/sqrt(2) and (…