Skip to content
0:00 / 0:00

#bayestheorem#bayesianprobability#conditionalprobability

The Bayesian Trap

Veritasium

21M subscribers • 25 videos on Hallway

YouTube
  • Recommended by 2 people: 2 on Hacker News.
  • May be out of date. Uploaded 9 years ago, in an area where tools change fast.

Beginner. No background in the topic needed.

4.5M views9 years ago2 recommendations

Computer scienceAI and machine learningMath for machine learningMath for programmers

An explanation of Bayes' theorem and how conditional probability and priors shape our interpretation of repeated events.

Bayes' theorem explained with examples and implications for life. Check out Audible: ve42.co/audible Support Veritasium on Patreon: ve42.co/patreon I didn't say it explicitly in the video, but in my view the Bayesian trap is interpreting events that happen repeatedly as events that happen inevitably. They may be inevitable OR they may simply be the outcome of a series of steps, which likely depend on our behaviour. Yet our expectation of a certain outcome often leads us to behave just as we always have which only ensures that outcome. To escape the Bayesian trap, we must be willing to experiment. Special thanks to Patreon supporters: Tony Fadell, Jeff Straathof, Donal Botkin, Zach Mueller, Ron Neal, Nathan Hansen, Saeed Alghamdi Useful references: The Signal and the Noise, Nate Silver The Theory That Would Not Die: How Bayes’ Rule Cracked the Enigma Code, Hunted Down Russian Submarines, and Emerged Triumphant from Two Centuries of Controversy, by Sharon Bertsch McGrayne Bayes' theorem or rule (there are many different versions of the same concept) has fascinated me for a long time due to its uses both in mathematics and statistics, and to solve real world problems. Bayesian inference has been used to crack the Enigma Code and to filter spam email. Bayes has also been used to locate the wreckage from plane crashes deep beneath the sea. Music from epidemicsound.com "Flourishing Views 3"

Why it's here

2 people recommend this

What people say. Recommended as a clear, example-driven introduction to Bayes' theorem and how priors affect our interpretation of data.

burntrelish1273on Hacker News • Recommends

On “Receding glacier causes Canadian river to vanish in four days”

Definitely. Another good idea is to show the difference between reality and data can be overwhelmingly significant. Videos demonstrating this with examples: - "The Bayesian Trap" link to this video - "Is Most Research Wrong?" link

partycoderon Hacker News • Recommends

On “Think Bayes: Bayesian Statistics Made Simple (2012)”

Another problem for the less familiar with the Bayes theorem is what is described as the "Bayesian trap", explained by the youtuber Veritasium: link to this video

tmamicon Hacker News • Mentions

On “Ask HN: How to choose which dentist or doctor to believe?”

…, do the no2, remember no3. You then pay for multiple of them to do the same. But then you still get to the point where you have to decide who to believe. And it would be easy if 4 of them say the same thing. You can be pretty sure they are right1 because statistics. But what happens when they give multiple differing opinions, like here 2. 1 link to this video 2 link…

LolBatmanHuntsUon Hacker News • Mentions

On “Ask HN: What Are You Working On? (August 2024)”

Inspired by this Veritasium video: link to this video I'm working on a journal that incorporates Bayesian learning on how aspects of my life affect my mental, physical and social well-being. Having used it for nearly 500 days I plan to turn it into a life accounting and auditing tool. link

u/kentnlin r/compsci • Mentions

On “Why Don't Computer Scientists Learn Math? - Leslie Lamport”

I love mathematical *concepts*, I love reading about Bayesian Statistics. For instance, this is *awesome*: link to this video But what I don't like is mathematical notation, or how math is taught, where it gravitates too much towards getting the syntax right, and doesn't gravitate anywhere nearly enough towards "mathematical thinking" For instance, in the aforementioned video, I just have to close my eyes when he's talking about the syntax, because that is just *boring* to me, its vague and unfamiliar and doesn't inform me in any way what so ever. And like, I visit wikipedia, and look at pages on programming things I understand so well that I can implement them, with the intent on linking them to s…