Skip to content
0:00 / 0:00

#gpt-3#openai#transformer

GPT-3: Language Models are Few-Shot Learners (Paper Explained)

Yannic Kilcher

333K subscribers • 4 videos on Hallway

YouTube
  • Recommended by 1 person: 1 in engineering communities.
  • Presented by Yannic Kilcher
  • Linked in the descriptionopenai/gpt-3arXiv 2005.14165
  • May be out of date. Uploaded 6 years ago, in an area where tools change fast.

Intermediate. Assumes working knowledge.

219K views6 years ago1 recommendation

AI and machine learningTransformers and LLMsNeural networks and deep learning

Yannic Kilcher explains the GPT-3 paper, detailing its architecture, dataset, and performance across various NLP tasks.

#gpt3 #openai #gpt-3 How far can you go with ONLY language modeling? Can a large enough language model perform NLP task out of the box? OpenAI take on these and other questions by training a transformer that is an order of magnitude larger than anything that has ever been built before and the results are astounding. OUTLINE: - Intro & Overview - Language Models - Language Modeling Datasets - Model Size - Transformer Models - Fine Tuning - In-Context Learning - Start of Experimental Results - Question Answering - What I think is happening - Translation - Winograd Schemes - Commonsense Reasoning - Reading Comprehension - SuperGLUE - NLI - Arithmetic Expressions - Word Unscrambling - SAT Analogies - News Article Generation - Made-up Words - Training Set Contamination - Task Examples arxiv.org/abs/2005.14165 github.com/openai/gpt-3 Abstract: Recent work has demonstrated substantial gains on many NLP tasks and benchmarks by pre-training on a large corpus of text followed by fine-tuning on a specific task. While typically task-agnostic in architecture, this method still requires task-specific fine-tuning datasets of thousands or tens of thousands of examples. By contrast, humans can generally perform a new language task from only a few examples or from simple instructions - something which current NLP systems still largely struggle to do. Here we show that scaling up language models greatly improves task-agnostic, few-shot performance, sometimes even reaching competitiveness with prior state-of-the-art fine-tuning approaches. Specifically, we train GPT-3, an autoregressive language model with 175 billion parameters, 10x more than any previous non-sparse language model, and test its performance in the few-shot setting. For all tasks, GPT-3 is applied without any gradient updates or fine-tuning, with tasks and few-shot demonstrations specified purely via text interaction with the model. GPT-3 achieves strong performance on many NLP datasets, including translation, question-answering, and cloze tasks, as well as several tasks that require on-the-fly reasoning or domain adaptation, such as unscrambling words, using a novel word in a sentence, or performing 3-digit arithmetic. At the same time, we also identify some datasets where GPT-3's few-shot learning still struggles, as well as some datasets where GPT-3 faces methodological issues related to training on large web corpora. Finally, we find that GPT-3 can generate samples of news articles which human evaluators have difficulty distinguishing from articles written by humans. We discuss broader societal impacts of this finding and of GPT-3 in general. Authors: Tom B. Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah, Jared Kaplan, Prafulla Dhariwal, Arvind Neelakantan, Pranav Shyam, Girish Sastry, Amanda Askell, Sandhini Agarwal, Ariel Herbert-Voss, G

Why it's here

1 person recommends this

What people say. Recommended for its detailed explanation of GPT-3 and its analysis of whether the model is reasoning or memorizing.

u/_Idmi_in r/compsci • Recommends

On “[R] OpenAI Unveils 175 Billion Parameter GPT-3 Language Model”

…e 2 digit addition is popular online and any web crawl will get tonnes, so the model sees a lot and memorises the answers, but it's just simply less likely that it has seen a 4 digit number because they're bigger numbers so it just doesn't do well. This dude does a great job of explaining why this is and I'm just gonna parrot him in my own words link to this video It may 'generate' great articles, but if you take a small phrase from even some of the examples in the paper, you can see it's just copying from other articles online. You can take a random phrase from its article that doesn't mention the key topic, and googling it might just bring up an article with that exact phrase as well as being abou…

u/_Idmi_in r/compsci • Recommends

On “[R] OpenAI Unveils 175 Billion Parameter GPT-3 Language Model”

…oogle a bit. The authors keep saying it has learnt to reason because it gives good outputs to testing data but they just don't do a good job of making sure that the testing data isn't in the training dataset and I don't blame them, the dataset is huge and is going to cover tens of thousands of formats. This guy does ana amazing job of explaining link to this video But yeah it seems like we are at the end of bigger = better and we need better models.…

u/_Idmi_in r/compsci • Recommends

On “[R] OpenAI Unveils 175 Billion Parameter GPT-3 Language Model”

…e 2 digit addition is popular online and any web crawl will get tonnes, so the model sees a lot and memorises the answers, but it's just simply less likely that it has seen a 4 digit number because they're bigger numbers so it just doesn't do well. This dude does a great job of explaining why this is and I'm just gonna parrot him in my own words link to this video It may 'generate' great articles, but if you take a small phrase from even some of the examples in the paper, you can see it's just copying from other articles online. You can take a random phrase from its article that doesn't mention the key topic, and googling it might just bring up an article with that exact phrase as well as being abou…

u/_Idmi_in r/compsci • Recommends

On “[R] OpenAI Unveils 175 Billion Parameter GPT-3 Language Model”

…could reason this is because 2 digit addition is popular online and any web crawl will get tonnes, so the model sees a lot and memorises the answers, but it's just simply less likely that it has seen a 4 digit number because they're bigger numbers. This dude does a great job of explaining why this is and I'm just gonna parrot him in my own words link to this video It may 'generate' great articles, but if you take a small phrase from even some of the examples in the paper, you can see it's just copying from other articles online. You can take a random phrase from its article that doesn't mention the key topic, and googling it might just bring up an article with that exact phrase as well as being abou…