Are We There Yet - Rich Hickey

Are We There Yet

I personally started with this talk by Rich Hickey (person who made Clojure) link to this video One of the best "why Clojure" talks that I've seen, especially for somebody coming from an OOP perspective, like myself.

>> I am surprised that there are still no software development platforms where you use one language for all levels and do not have to translate between different ways of representing data and interacting with services. You've spotted a problem that I think many people are blind to. I agree 100%. If you'd like to explore more about Clojure, I highly recommend this talk link to this video

If you're going to reference a Rich Hickey take-down of OOP, I think "Are We There Yet?" is the most pertinent: link to this video Of course, Simple Made Easy is excellent too, probably his most influential talk.

Rich Hickey made a great talk on this in 2009 link to this video An other way to think about it is that the programs we write do not literally simulate entities (users, other domain objects like books, students, professors, classes, etc). Our software simulates the record keeping devices that store /protect information regarding these entities. We are most of the time writing information processing systems, not simulation systems and information accumulates, rather than updates in places. Like, e.g. when there's a new president elected, we don't all go out with our erasers and remove all references to change sentences from "The President is Donald Trump" to say "The President is Joe Biden", instead we…

Rich Hickey's: Are We There Yet may be interesting to any one here: link to this video I found this to be one of the more interesting talks I've watched. Like you (I think) - I love functional languages. But there's a problem I can't really figure out how to articulate where they reach a level where they stop "just working" imo. Maybe it's just me being too dumb.

Late to the party here, but what you propose is not being cheeky. Rich Hickey (Clojure creator) himself has a similar, interesting, and compelling take on time and mutability 0. This perspective is the underlying basis of Datomic. 0 - link to this video