Skip to content
0:00 / 0:00

#writing#communication#academicwriting

LEADERSHIP LAB: Writing Beyond the Academy 1.23.15

UChicago Social Sciences

172K subscribers • 2 videos on Hallway

YouTube
  • Recommended by 4 people: 4 on Hacker News.
  • A classic. People kept recommending it from 2020 to 2025.
  • Presented by Larry McEnerney, University of Chicago Writing Program
  • An opinion. It argues one side of a question engineers disagree on.

Beginner. No background in the topic needed.

1.7M views11 years ago4 recommendations

Tools and practiceCareers and interviewsCode review and teamworkDeveloper productivity

Larry McEnerney explains how to write effectively by focusing on what readers value rather than following rigid academic rules.

Speaker: Larry McEnerney (University of Chicago Writing Program) When graduate students envision themselves working outside academia, they often worry about writing. This is sensible: academics who work outside academia are endlessly criticized for writing "like a professor". Worse, writers who are criticized in this way are often baffled at how to adapt to their new world. Very often, they try to change aspects of their writing that are not troublesome, and they leave in place aspects of their writing that are making their writing less clear, less logical, and less valuable to their readers. This session will be about a few patterns of writing that are likely to aggravate non-academic readers. We'll focus on patterns that are often difficult for academics to see, but are actually fairly easy to change.

Why it's here

4 people recommend this

What people say. Highly recommended by engineers as an essential lecture for learning how to write valuable, professional, and persuasive technical communications.

gnuvinceon Hacker News • Recommends

On “Write Like You Code”

My favorite writing lecture is this one: link to this video The number one piece of advice: your writing can be clear and structured, but if it's not valuable it's useless and people will stop reading. If you want to write well, figure out who your readers are, figure out what they value, and give it to them.

gnuvinceon Hacker News • Recommends

On “What makes writing more readable?”

It's an article about writing, which means I will plug this lecture again: link to this video Short version: good writing is not about rules, it's about the function of the text, the readers, and what they value.

thundergolferon Hacker News • Recommends

On “How to communicate effectively as a developer”

…ication in chat apps. For advice on writing long form communications, my absolute favorite resource is LEADERSHIP LAB: Writing Beyond the Academy 1. This lecture will cleanse you of all the bad writing ideas you picked up in 12+ years of schooling, and show you actually how to think about professional writing. I've watched it about 4-5 times. 1. link to this video…

voortuckianon Hacker News • Recommends

On “How to write technical posts so people will read them (2019)”

This is clearer, more indepth, and longer: link to this video But I found it more motivated me to change. (Chicago U, writing class for grad students)

gnuvinceon Hacker News • Recommends

On “Writing like a pro with Vale and Neovim”

A post about writing means that I need to plug a couple talks by Larry McEnerney. 1,2 The tool described in this blog post is all about text-based rules: what the _text_ ought to look like. To improve your own writing (a) learn who your readers are, (b) know what they value, and (c) write so that as readers, they find your work valuable to them. 1 link 2 link to this video

motohagiographyon Hacker News • Recommends

On “Writing is thinking”

the act of writing takes raw experience, puts it in front of the eyes, and then filters it back through your critical faculties so you can refine and reason about it. the iteration makes it higher quality thought. making writing valuable is another skill (see this evergreen lecture from the university of chicago leadership lab: link to this video ) however when I encounter people with low written or verbal acuity, they have to survive somehow, so it's wise to observe what tools of cunning they tend to reach for.

teddyhon Hacker News • Mentions

On “Explaining explaining: a quick guide on explanatory writing”

Apologies, that was the wrong link: the explicit mention of the three-step structure is here: link to this video ALthough, I think that the first link is a better version of the two.

teddyhon Hacker News • Mentions

On “Repeat Yourself, a Lot”

> "Tell ‘Em What You’re Going To Tell ‘Em; Next, Tell ‘Em; Next, Tell ‘Em What You Told ‘Em" “This is not a source of value !” — link to this video