jacoboluson Hacker News • Recommends
On “What HN users don't mean to be”
#douglashofstadter#analogy#cognition
2.2M subscribers • 18 videos on Hallway
Intermediate. Assumes working knowledge.
600K views17 years ago7 recommendations
AI and machine learningComputer scienceComputation and complexity
Douglas Hofstadter explores how analogy-making is the central mechanism of human cognition, categorization, and thought.
In this Presidential Lecture, cognitive scientist Douglas Hofstadter examines the role and contributions of analogy in cognition, using a variety of analogies to illustrate his points. Stanford University: stanford.edu/ Stanford Humanities Center: shc.stanford.edu/ Stanford University Channel on YouTube: youtube.com/stanfordWhat people say. Highly recommended as a fascinating and foundational lecture on how humans think and how that relates to artificial intelligence.
jacoboluson Hacker News • Recommends
On “What HN users don't mean to be”
boboshaon Hacker News • Recommends
On “Ask HN: What is your favourite tech talk?”
sitkackon Hacker News • Recommends
On “Dijkstra Was Wrong About 'Radical Novelty'”
MichaelMoser123on Hacker News • Recommends
On “The Man Who Would Teach Machines to Think”
sitkackon Hacker News • Recommends
On “Introduction to Artificial Neural Networks – Part 1”
rabinoon Hacker News • Recommends
On “Atlassian Developer Makes A Horribly Sexist Presentation At A Tech Conference”
ssivarkon Hacker News • Recommends
On “The Origin of Consciousness in the Breakdown of the Bicameral Mind (1976)”
passion__desireon Hacker News • Recommends
On “The case for and against analogies”
u/ineticin r/haskell • Mentions
On “Why are analogies and metaphors used so much in describing the functions and features present in Haskell?”
u/qriosin r/compsci • Mentions
On “Breakthroughs in Artificial Stupidity (Omni, May 1985)”
b450on Hacker News • Mentions
On “The case for and against analogies”
nthingtohideon Hacker News • Mentions
On “Notation as a Tool of Thought (1979)”
penguin_boozeon Hacker News • Mentions
On “How large are large language models?”